Skip to main content
Independent news from the heart of Darfur and Sudan
Watch live

Sudan court drops charges against 24 women in trousers

December 10 - 2017 KHARTOUM
Sudanese women in downtown Khartoum (
Sudanese women in downtown Khartoum (

(UPDATE 18:30) A Sudanese district court in Khartoum dropped the charges of indecency against 24 women who were caught wearing trousers at a party on Wednesday evening.​

The party took place in El Mamoura, south of Khartoum, when the public order police appeared. The court session was scheduled to be held in El Shargi District Court.

Speaking to Radio Dabanga, one of the leaders of the No Suppression for Women Initiative, Amira Osman said that the community security prosecution has charged the women under Article 152 of the Criminal Code.

She expressed her indignation at the raid. “The party took place in a closed hall in a building in El Mamoura. The girls were arrested for wearing trousers, despite obtaining a permit from the authorities.”

Osman appealed to activists and human rights defenders to attend the trial on Sunday. The Public Order Act should be repealed, she added. “It violates women’s rights.”

Inappropriate dress’

Many women have been tried under Article 152. It is applied to “Whoever does in a public place an indecent act or an act contrary to public morals, or wears an obscene outfit, or contrary to public morals, or causing an annoyance to public feelings shall be punished with flogging, which may not exceed forty lashes or with fine or with both.”

Last August, Sudan's Public Order Court has dismissed charges against two girls, accused of wearing disgraceful dress, citing a lack of evidence by the police and because the judge concluded that “trousers are not disgraceful”.

Most times when women are tried, however, a conviction follows. The crime is punishable by up to 40 lashes and a fine.

Last month in Northern State, 83 youths and students were convicted to be shaved in public for their “odd shaving and wearing inappropriate uniforms”, as the city court ruled.

Back to overview