{"id":20135161,"date":"2026-07-23T17:15:04","date_gmt":"2026-07-23T15:15:04","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.dabangasudan.org\/?p=20135161"},"modified":"2026-07-23T17:15:48","modified_gmt":"2026-07-23T15:15:48","slug":"human-rights-watch-us-congress-should-pass-new-bills-on-sudan","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.dabangasudan.org\/en\/all-news\/article\/human-rights-watch-us-congress-should-pass-new-bills-on-sudan","title":{"rendered":"Human Rights Watch: \u2018US Congress should pass new bills on Sudan\u2019"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

The US Congress is currently considering two bills on Sudan: the Preventing External Aggression and Conflict Escalation (PEACE) in Sudan Act of 2026 in<\/a> the Senate and US Engagement in Sudanese Peace Act<\/a> in the House of Representatives. Human Rights Watch (HRW) asserts that \u201cby pushing for such legislation, Congress can play a vital role in responding to the human rights crisis in Sudan.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

A statement this week<\/a>, penned by Nicholas Freund of the Human Rights Watch (HRW) Washington agency, points out how \u201cthese bills contain several positive initiatives but should go further on accountability,\u201d and emphasises how the organisation has documented widespread abuses<\/a> by both the Rapid Support Forces (RSF) and the Sudanese Armed Forces (SAF), including attacks against civilians by both<\/a> groups<\/a>, widespread sexual violence by the RSF,<\/a> and evidence of ethnic cleansing<\/a> by the RSF in West Darfur.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cAlthough the administration has taken important steps on Sudan, including sanctions<\/a> on both parties to the conflict, the US government has failed, along with the international community, to apply sufficient pressure to stop the atrocities and improve humanitarian conditions. Both bills bolster the US government\u2019s response to the conflict, including by reinforcing the role of the special envoy on Sudan, which is currently vacant, and enabling the US to sanction those responsible for abuses in the country,\u201d the HRW statement says.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It underscores that HRW has consistently urged the UN Security Council to authorise the deployment of a civilian protection mission in Sudan, pointing out that the House\u2019s legislation authorises US government support for a United Nations, African Union, or multinational force in Sudan.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cBoth bills would also require the US government to identify foreign governments\u2019 activities in Sudan and whether they are in violation of the UN arms embargo. The House bill would ban the sale of major defence equipment to any government supplying weapons to the RSF or SAF, unless waived for national security reasons,\u201d HRW says.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cThese are welcome proposals given the growing evidence that the RSF has received military support from the UAE and recent Human Rights Watch findings<\/a> that a UAE-based company hired Colombian private military contractors that trained at UAE military bases before deploying to Sudan to support the RSF.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cCongress should enhance accountability measures in the bills to ensure the US government plays an active role in seeking a comprehensive approach to accountability in Sudan. Congress should direct the administration to support ongoing investigation efforts of serious international crimes, including support to the collection and preservation of evidence for future accountability processes to advance justice for victims.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cBy pushing for such legislation, Congress can play a vital role in responding to the human rights crisis in Sudan,\u201d HRW concludes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

(Source: HRW<\/a>)<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n