{"id":20078207,"date":"2024-03-21T09:51:56","date_gmt":"2024-03-21T08:51:56","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.dabangasudan.org\/?p=20078207"},"modified":"2024-04-18T11:42:22","modified_gmt":"2024-04-18T09:42:22","slug":"sudan-civil-democratic-forces-leaked-document-slanderously-attributed-to-hamdok-spa","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.dabangasudan.org\/en\/all-news\/article\/sudan-civil-democratic-forces-leaked-document-slanderously-attributed-to-hamdok-spa","title":{"rendered":"Sudan Civil Democratic Forces: \u2018Leaked document slanderously attributed to Hamdok, SPA\u2019"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

A \u2018leaked\u2019 document purporting to be a proposal to resolve the war in Sudan, has been falsely attributed to former Sudan prime minister and current chair of the Civil Democratic Forces (Tagaddum<\/em>) Abdalla Hamdok, and the Sudanese Professional Association (SPA) according to the spokesperson for Tagaddum<\/em>, Alaaeldin Nugud.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

In an interview with Radio Dabanga correspondent Ashraf Abdelaziz in the Ethiopian capital Addis Ababa yesterday, Nugud said the leaked document on resolving the war crisis in Sudan, which was touted as a proposal by Hamdok and the Sudanese Professionals Association, \u201cwas falsely attributed<\/a> to Hamdok and the association and bears many contradictions within it\u201d.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Nugud accused \u201cthe elements of the former regime and the Islamic Movement\u201d of being behind the \u201cfabrication\u201d of this document and its purpose \u201cin order to block the way for the efforts made by Taggadum<\/em> to stop the war.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cThe leaked document carries its rejection within it, and it is built on three points, the basic principles of the solution, humanitarian aid, and the political process,\u201d he said, adding that I think this document is very similar to the Manama document, and has many of what is mentioned in the document.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

He added that on the side of security issues, the leaked document talks about the selection of two members of the army and the Rapid Support Forces (RSF), one of whom is an army commander, two deputies, a chief of staff and a chief of staff from the RSF, air, sea and land according to specialization and efficiency, and then talks about immunity for the army commander and the RSF commander, so who has the right to give them immunity? Local and international fact-finding committees to uncover the perpetrators of violations and hold them accountable were also clearly omitted, as impunity is one of the pillars on which transitional justice is based.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cThe contradictions appear clearly in the arrangement of the transitional period, especially the executive branch\u2026 The document lacks realism and carries many contradictions, and I think that it was developed in this disorderly way and falsely attributed to the SPA and Abdalla Hamdok for a specific purpose, which is to question the civil forces\u2026 such documents come out in an attempt to undermine its efforts.\u201d<\/p>\n