{"id":20075738,"date":"2024-03-05T10:21:00","date_gmt":"2024-03-05T09:21:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.dabangasudan.org\/?p=20075738"},"modified":"2024-03-05T15:06:02","modified_gmt":"2024-03-05T14:06:02","slug":"sudan-and-iran-dismiss-talk-of-red-sea-naval-base-as-scuttlebutt","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.dabangasudan.org\/en\/all-news\/article\/sudan-and-iran-dismiss-talk-of-red-sea-naval-base-as-scuttlebutt","title":{"rendered":"Sudan and Iran dismiss talk of Red Sea naval base as ‘scuttlebutt’"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Iran has denied attempting to entice Sudan to allow it to establish a naval base on the strategic Red Sea coast, a day after Sudan\u2019s Foreign Ministry issued a similar denial. The respective rebuttals from Port Sudan and Teheran follow a report by the <\/strong>Wall Street Journal<\/em> on Sunday, citing \u201ca senior Sudanese intelligence official\u201d, who alleges that Sudan turned down overtures from Iran, which included a pledge of a warship in exchange, to establish a permanent naval base on Sudan\u2019s Red Sea coast.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman Nasser Kinani told a news conference yesterday that the report was \u201cbaseless and politically motivated\u201d. Following the appearance of the WSJ<\/em> report<\/a> on Monday, Sudan\u2019s acting Minister of Foreign Affairs refuted the story as \u201clies\u201d and \u201cfabricated.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to the report, Sudan rejected Iran\u2019s offer for fear of angering the USA and Israel. Iran has already supplied the Sudanese Armed Forces (SAF) with Mohajer 6 drones, which experts told Radio Dabanga have contributed to the progress the SAF is now making in Omdurman<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The paramilitary Rapid Support Forces (RSF) claim to have shot down or neutralised<\/a> several of these drones.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Iran\u2019s navy has maintained a presence in the Red Sea for years, but has no naval base in these strategic waters. While two of its warships docked in Port Sudan in 2021, Iran denies applying to Sudan for a naval base.<\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\"\"
Iranian ship Behshad, that allegedly serves as a ‘spy ship’ in the Red Sea for Iran’s Revolutionary Guards (File photo: Akbar Tavakkoli \/ IRNA)<\/em><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

Commercial shipping traffic in the Red Sea has been hampered since November, when Yemen\u2019s Iran-backed Houthis began targeting Israeli-linked vessels. Analysts say Tehran used its spy ship Behshad<\/a> in the Gulf of Aden to provide the Houthis with intelligence.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

As previously reported by Radio Dabanga, on February 6, Iranian President Ebrahim Raisi received Sudan\u2019s acting Foreign Minister Ali El Sadig in Tehran, confirming the restoration of mutual relations<\/a> after a hiatus of seven years.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In October last year, Sudan and Iran announced their decision to restore diplomatic relations<\/a>, marking the end of a seven-year hiatus. Two months later, Radio Dabanga reported that a SAF delegation allegedly visited Iran to purchase<\/a> Iranian-made combat drones. In end January, the Rapid Support Forces (RSF) said they downed a Iranian-made Mohajer-6 drone in Khartoum state.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Khartoum severed ties with Iran<\/a> in 2016, following the deterioration of Saudi-Iranian relations. Khartoum had fostered good relations with Iran since the regime under Omar Al Bashir came into power via a coup d\u2019\u00e9tat in 1989. Yet, the relations cooled down in March 2016, after Sudan opted to support Saudi Arabia in its military campaign against Shiite Houthi insurgents in Yemen.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In end 2020, Sudan normalised its relations with Israel<\/a>. The Council of Ministers headed by PM Abdallah Hamdok denied a connection with the USA<\/a> removing Sudan from its list of State Sponsors of Terrorism. In February that year, the chair of the Sovereign Council, Lt Gen Abdelfattah El Burhan, and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu met in Entebbe<\/a> in Uganda.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Red Sea coast<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The strategic importance of Port Sudan has been highlighted most recently amid rising security concerns for shipping in the Red Sea<\/a>, where the Iran-backed Houthi movement within Yemen has staged multiple attacks and seizures of civilian-operated cargo ships sailing near the Yemeni coast.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In the past, both the USA and Russia have shown interest in Port Sudan, in terms of controlling and monitoring shipping in the Red Sea. In 2021, US Military Maritime Transport Command USNS Carson City<\/a> <\/em>docked in Port Sudan, representing the first visit by a US Navy ship for decades.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

A week later, the US Warship USS Winston Churchill<\/em> docked in Port Sudan<\/a>, while the next day, a Russian frigate was received in the port with similar honours.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Plans to establish Russian military infrastructure on the shores of Suakin, 63km south of Port Sudan, date back to 2017, to a high-profile visit by the since deposed dictator, Omar Al Bashir<\/a>, to Russia in November of that year.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Operations to construct the military base were scheduled to begin four years ago, when initial agreements were finalised in 2020<\/a>. As per the agreement, Sudan was supposed to provide Russia with an area to deploy 300 Russian military personnel, four ships, and an \u201cunlimited number\u201d of ships in the region for a period of 25 years, in exchange for weapons.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The facility was intended to be a logistics post for the Russian navy, which would allow the placement of large ships and nuclear submarines.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

However, following the outbreak of the war between the SAF and RSF in April 2023, those planse have been \u201cindefinitely shelved\u201d.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Parliamentary ratification of  the agreement failed several times, and despite initial hopes in early 2023, the signing of the treaty was indefinitely postponed<\/a> when fighting broke out in April of that year.<\/p>\n